So I feel you can influence evolution of your companions, and then have them different.
I haven't finished the game yet nor have explored the various possibilities. And it's an error to just translate the words in their modern real life equivalent. Only D&D lore context provides a meaning to good/evil/neutral and is god based, pantheon/religion based. D&D Neutral is just about keeping a balance between Evil and Good, not about having a neutral path. Neutral is pure convention and means nothing but inside D&D lore.
#Blackguards 2 companions serial#
Evil is a focus on doing Evil stuff and beside some psychotic serial killer, it's not a realistic psychology. The first point is Evil/Good/Neutral is pure D&D convention and means nothing outside of D&D lore (unlike chaotic/neutral/lawful): The companions have evolved a bit and their personality have a bit more finesse.Ībout Evil/non evil, it's not that simple. To OP, the writing quality is quite improved with BLG2. Those actually had some chars you didnt want to strangle yourself all the time, so they stop being so insufferably smug. I know the main protagonist is different this time and actually rather cool looking, but do we get any characters with more depth than sheet of paper, or are we stuck with those 3 i already listed? Because then this game is just a sad excuse for a real TDE experience and i will rather replay Drakensang or Mass Effect or Dragon Age for the 10th time. The one with character depth and potential.) i was wondering, whether Blackguards 2 would have anything else to offer than a Hyper-Cliche-Dwarf, a Date-R4pist (because anyone who ever played The Dark Eye knows that everyone in Al Anfa is 90% 4asshat and 10% necromancer) and The-Guy-With-The-Spear who somehow manages to be even more of a cliche. So, having stopped playing Blackguards 1 after the only decent character got killed of (You know, the one with an actually tragic background, who wasnt whining all the time or being cliche as hell.
0 kommentar(er)
